# Llama 3.2 1B vs Wizardlm 13b

> Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-1b-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 1B scores higher in 0 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Wizardlm 13b leads 30.2 to 10.4.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 1B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 20.1 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 354 | 274 |
| Context | 60K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.027 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 1B: 21.1 (#338)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1070 | 1035 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 8.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 11.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 1B: 14.6 (#150)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 10.8% | — |
| BALROG | 6.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 1B: 16.2 (#308)
- Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1044 | 1018 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 101.99 | — |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 1B: 10.4 (#313)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1086 | 1017 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 1B: 7.2 (#312)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 23.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1007 | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 1B: 23.8 (#292)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 959 | 1023 |
| LMArena German | 1014 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 941 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 1B: 52.4 (#290)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1031 | 1048 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 1B: 31.9 (#274)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1050 | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 1B: 21.3 (#310)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1055 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1030 | 1047 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 200 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 1B better than Wizardlm 13b?

Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 3.2 1B or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Wizardlm 13b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.1 versus 21.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 1B and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 1B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.