# Llama 3.2 1B vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

> Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-1b-vs-qwen3-5-max-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 1B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.0 to 21.3.
- Llama 3.2 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 1B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 20.1 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 354 | 71 |
| Context | 60K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.027 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 1B: 21.1 (#338)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1070 | 1487 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 8.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 11.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 1B: 14.6 (#150)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 10.8% | — |
| BALROG | 6.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 1B: 16.2 (#308)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1044 | 1483 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 101.99 | — |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 1B: 10.4 (#313)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1086 | 1474 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 1B: 7.2 (#312)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1007 | 1489 |
| GPQA Diamond | 23.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 1B: 23.8 (#292)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 959 | 1534 |
| LMArena German | 1014 | 1487 |
| LMArena Russian | 941 | 1471 |
| LMArena French | — | 1484 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1495 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1438 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 1B: 52.4 (#290)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1031 | 1467 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 1B: 31.9 (#274)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1050 | 1476 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 1B: 21.3 (#310)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1055 | 1470 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1030 | 1478 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 200 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 1B better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 3.2 1B or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 21.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 1B and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 1B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.