# Llama 3.2 1B vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct

> Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-1b-vs-phi-3-medium-4k-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 1B scores higher in 0 categories and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads 33.4 to 10.4.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 1B | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 20.1 | 33.0 |
| Rank | 354 | 250 |
| Context | 60K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.027 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 1B: 21.1 (#338)
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1070 | 1130 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 8.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 11.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 1B: 14.6 (#150)
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 10.8% | — |
| BALROG | 6.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 1B: 16.2 (#308)
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1044 | 1127 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 101.99 | — |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 1B: 10.4 (#313)
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1086 | 1173 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 1B: 7.2 (#312)
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1007 | 1108 |
| GPQA Diamond | 23.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 1B: 23.8 (#292)
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 1094 |
| LMArena Chinese | 959 | 1108 |
| LMArena German | 1014 | 1101 |
| LMArena Russian | 941 | 1145 |
| LMArena French | — | 1110 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1042 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 954 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1095 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 1B: 52.4 (#290)
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1031 | 1113 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 1B: 31.9 (#274)
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1050 | 1120 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 1B: 21.3 (#310)
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1055 | 1138 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | 1107 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1030 | 1088 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 200 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 1B better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 3.2 1B or Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better for coding?

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 21.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 1B and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 1B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.