# Llama 3.2 1B vs Phi-1.5

> Llama 3.2 1B has enough public results to be ranked (#354); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-1b-vs-phi-1-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 1B | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 20.1 | — |
| Rank | 354 | — |
| Context | 60K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.027 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 1B: 21.1 (#338)
- Phi-1.5: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 8.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1070 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 11.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 1B: 14.6 (#150)
- Phi-1.5: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 10.8% | — |
| BALROG | 6.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 1B: 16.2 (#308)
- Phi-1.5: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 101.99 | 91.53 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1044 | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 47.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73.4% |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 1B: 10.4 (#313)
- Phi-1.5: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1086 | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 1B: 7.2 (#312)
- Phi-1.5: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 23.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1007 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 44.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 75.8% |
| MMLU | — | 37.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 37.2% |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 1B: 23.8 (#292)
- Phi-1.5: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 959 | — |
| LMArena German | 1014 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 941 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 1B: 52.4 (#290)
- Phi-1.5: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1031 | — |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 1B: 31.9 (#274)
- Phi-1.5: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1050 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 1B: 21.3 (#310)
- Phi-1.5: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 200 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1030 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 1B better than Phi-1.5?

Llama 3.2 1B has enough public results to be ranked (#354); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 1B and Phi-1.5 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Llama 3.2 1B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Phi-1.5 has 7.