# Llama 3.2 1B vs Palm 2

> Palm 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.0 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-1b-vs-palm-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 1B scores higher in 3 categories and Palm 2 in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Palm 2 leads 30.8 to 10.4.
- Llama 3.2 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 1B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Google |
| Noometry Index | 20.1 | 30.0 |
| Rank | 354 | 298 |
| Context | 60K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.027 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 1B: 21.1 (#338)
- Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1070 | 994 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 8.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 11.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 1B: 14.6 (#150)
- Palm 2: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 10.8% | — |
| BALROG | 6.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 1B: 16.2 (#308)
- Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1044 | 1005 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 101.99 | — |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 1B: 10.4 (#313)
- Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1086 | 1049 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 1B: 7.2 (#312)
- Palm 2: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 23.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1007 | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 1B: 23.8 (#292)
- Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 916 |
| LMArena Chinese | 959 | 887 |
| LMArena German | 1014 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 941 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 1B: 52.4 (#290)
- Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1031 | 1010 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 1B: 31.9 (#274)
- Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1050 | 1010 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 1B: 21.3 (#310)
- Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1055 | 1027 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | 991 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1030 | 994 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 200 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 1B better than Palm 2?

Palm 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.0 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 3.2 1B or Palm 2 better for coding?

Palm 2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.0 versus 21.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 1B and Palm 2 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 1B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.