# Llama 3.2 1B vs Olmo 7b Instruct

> Olmo 7b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.3 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-1b-vs-olmo-7b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 1B scores higher in 1 category and Olmo 7b Instruct in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 7b Instruct leads 30.2 to 10.4.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 1B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 20.1 | 30.3 |
| Rank | 354 | 295 |
| Context | 60K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.027 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 1B: 21.1 (#338)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1070 | 1016 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 8.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 11.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 1B: 14.6 (#150)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 10.8% | — |
| BALROG | 6.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 1B: 16.2 (#308)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1044 | 993 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 101.99 | — |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 1B: 10.4 (#313)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1086 | 1018 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 1B: 7.2 (#312)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 23.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1007 | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 1B: 23.8 (#292)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 959 | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | 941 | 947 |
| LMArena German | 1014 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 1B: 52.4 (#290)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1031 | 978 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 1B: 31.9 (#274)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1050 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 1B: 21.3 (#310)
- Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1055 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1030 | 1007 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 200 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 1B better than Olmo 7b Instruct?

Olmo 7b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.3 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 3.2 1B or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 7b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.6 versus 21.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 1B and Olmo 7b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 1B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.