# Llama 3.2 1B vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

> Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-1b-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 1B scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 50.2 to 21.3.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 20.1 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 354 | 168 |
| Context | 60K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.027 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 1B: 21.1 (#338)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1070 | 1347 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 8.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 11.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 1B: 14.6 (#150)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 10.8% | — |
| BALROG | 6.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 1B: 16.2 (#308)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1044 | 1322 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 101.99 | — |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 1B: 10.4 (#313)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1086 | 1305 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 1B: 7.2 (#312)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1007 | 1308 |
| GPQA Diamond | 23.9% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 1B: 23.8 (#292)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 959 | 1304 |
| LMArena German | 1014 | 1282 |
| LMArena Russian | 941 | 1268 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1336 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 1B: 52.4 (#290)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1031 | 1299 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 1B: 31.9 (#274)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1050 | 1312 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 1B: 21.3 (#310)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1055 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1030 | 1309 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 200 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 1B better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 3.2 1B or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 21.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 1B and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 1B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.