# Llama 3.2 1B vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

> Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-1b-vs-olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 1B scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 42.1 to 21.3.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 1B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 20.1 | 32.7 |
| Rank | 354 | 254 |
| Context | 60K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.027 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 1B: 21.1 (#338)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1070 | 1210 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 8.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 11.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 1B: 14.6 (#150)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 10.8% | — |
| BALROG | 6.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 1B: 16.2 (#308)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1044 | 1208 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 101.99 | — |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 1B: 10.4 (#313)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1086 | 1208 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 1B: 7.2 (#312)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 23.9% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1007 | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 1B: 23.8 (#292)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 959 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 941 | 1187 |
| LMArena German | 1014 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 1B: 52.4 (#290)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1031 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 1B: 31.9 (#274)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1050 | 1194 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 1B: 21.3 (#310)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1055 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1030 | 1221 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 200 | — |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 1B better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 3.2 1B or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 21.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 1B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 1B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.