# Llama 3.2 1B vs Muse Spark

> Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-1b-vs-muse-spark
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 1B scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 7.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 0.6% for Llama 3.2 1B and 88.9% for Muse Spark.
- Llama 3.2 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 1B | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 20.1 | 50.6 |
| Rank | 354 | 46 |
| Context | 60K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.027 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 1B: 21.1 (#338)
- Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1070 | 1481 |
| SciCode | — | 51.5% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 8.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 11.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 1B: 14.6 (#150)
- Muse Spark: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 10.8% | — |
| BALROG | 6.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 1B: 16.2 (#308)
- Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1044 | 1474 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 101.99 | 152.04 |
| CritPt | — | 11.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 1B: 10.4 (#313)
- Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | 88.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1086 | 1455 |
| ProofBench | — | 17% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 39% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 14.6% |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 1B: 7.2 (#312)
- Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 23.9% | 89.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1007 | 1457 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 40.6% |

## Multimodal

- Llama 3.2 1B: —
- Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 1B: 23.8 (#292)
- Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 1464 |
| LMArena Chinese | 959 | 1509 |
| LMArena German | 1014 | 1497 |
| LMArena Russian | 941 | 1466 |
| LMArena French | — | 1497 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1459 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1472 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 1B: 52.4 (#290)
- Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1031 | 1442 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 1B: 31.9 (#274)
- Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1050 | 1451 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 1B: 21.3 (#310)
- Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1055 | 1474 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | 1459 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1030 | 1477 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 200 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 1B better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 20.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 3.2 1B or Muse Spark better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 21.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 1B and Muse Spark share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 1B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.