# Llama 3.2 1B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 19.9 on the Noometry Index. Llama 3.2 1B costs 2.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-2-1b-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.2 1B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 63.9 to 21.4.
- Llama 3.2 1B is cheaper at $0.027 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.14 / $0.28 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 60K.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.2 1B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 19.9 | 44.4 |
| Rank | 349 | 74 |
| Context | 60K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.027 | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | $0.20 | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3.2 1B: 20.6 (#333)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1071 | 1516 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 8.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 11.3% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.2 1B: 14.5 (#142)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 10.8% | — |
| BALROG | 6.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.2 1B: 15.6 (#304)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1044 | 1481 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 101.95 | — |

## Math

- Llama 3.2 1B: 9.7 (#308)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1086 | 1477 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.2 1B: 7.2 (#307)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1007 | 1516 |
| GPQA Diamond | 23.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 3.2 1B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1266 |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.2 1B: 23.9 (#287)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 1439 |
| LMArena Chinese | 958 | 1501 |
| LMArena Russian | 941 | 1424 |
| LMArena German | 1014 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.2 1B: 52.6 (#285)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1031 | 1463 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.2 1B: 31.9 (#269)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1050 | 1465 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.2 1B: 21.4 (#305)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.2 1B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1055 | 1459 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | 1408 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1030 | 1460 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 200 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.2 1B better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.4 to 19.9 on the Noometry Index. Llama 3.2 1B costs 2.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Llama 3.2 1B or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Llama 3.2 1B is cheaper. It lists at $0.027 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Flash lists at $0.14 and $0.28.

### Is Llama 3.2 1B or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 20.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 60K.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.2 1B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.2 1B has 22 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13.