# Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct vs MiMo-V2-Flash

> MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-1-nemotron-70b-instruct-vs-mimo-v2-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2-Flash in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 48.4.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 203 | 138 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.9 (#216)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1272 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 38.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 48.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 25.0 (#152)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1266 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |

## Math

- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.5 (#182)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1271 | 1396 |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 34.1 (#199)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1242 | 1425 |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 40.5 (#217)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1245 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1263 | 1462 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1387 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 65.9 (#213)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1252 | 1392 |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#215)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1238 | 1409 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 48.4 (#203)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1283 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1404 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (35.9 vs 36.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.