# Llama 3.1-8B vs Wizardlm 70b

> Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 22.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-1-8b-vs-wizardlm-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1-8B scores higher in 3 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Wizardlm 70b leads 29.7 to 9.5.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.1-8B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 22.8 | 32.4 |
| Rank | 347 | 245 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.05 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.08 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3.1-8B: 19.9 (#335)
- Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-8B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1195 | 1081 |
| SciCode | 13.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 1.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 32.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.5% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 62.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 55.6% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.1-8B: 22.3 (#123)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-8B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 25.8% | — |
| BALROG | 15.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.1-8B: 14.5 (#316)
- Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-8B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1175 | 1079 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 50.9% | — |
| LMCA | 5.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.48 | — |
| PIQA | 81.2% | — |

## Math

- Llama 3.1-8B: 9.5 (#311)
- Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-8B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1179 | 1116 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 13.7% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 22.9% | — |
| GSM8K | 82.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.1-8B: 8.0 (#302)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-8B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 40.6% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 24.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1144 | — |
| BoolQ | 82.8% | — |
| MMLU | 56.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.1-8B: 34.2 (#244)
- Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-8B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1148 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1151 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 1144 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1158 | 1155 |
| LMArena French | 1176 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1061 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1053 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1169 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.1-8B: 59.1 (#253)
- Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-8B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1159 | 1093 |
| IFEval | 74.3% | — |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.1-8B: 35.8 (#233)
- Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-8B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1182 | 1097 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.1-8B: 29.9 (#285)
- Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-8B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1187 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1154 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1172 | 1108 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 713 | — |
| WildBench | 68.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.1-8B better than Wizardlm 70b?

Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 22.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 3.1-8B or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Wizardlm 70b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.9 versus 19.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-8B and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1-8B has 43 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.