# Llama 3.1-70B vs Wizardlm 13b

> Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-1-70b-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1-70B scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Wizardlm 13b leads 27.8 to 12.7.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.1-70B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 299 | 272 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3.1-70B: 29.8 (#292)
- Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1260 | 1035 |
| WeirdML | 9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54.8% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.1-70B: 24.9 (#104)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 6.9% | — |
| BALROG | 27.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.1-70B: 20.8 (#215)
- Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1241 | 1018 |
| DTBench | 60% | — |
| LMCA | 14.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.91 | — |

## Math

- Llama 3.1-70B: 12.7 (#298)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1252 | 1017 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 3.6% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 21% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 36.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.1-70B: 24.1 (#264)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 44.2% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 65.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 42.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1209 | — |
| MMLU | 80.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.1-70B: 38.9 (#220)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1219 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1215 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1260 | — |
| LMArena German | 1222 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1132 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1140 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1234 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1253 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.1-70B: 65.5 (#218)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1231 | 1049 |
| IFEval | 82.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.1-70B: 37.6 (#208)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1241 | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.1-70B: 35.6 (#262)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1261 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1232 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1256 | 1047 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 784 | — |
| WildBench | 75.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.1-70B better than Wizardlm 13b?

Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 3.1-70B or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (29.8 vs 29.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-70B and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1-70B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.