# Llama 3.1-70B vs Magistral Medium

> Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index. Llama 3.1-70B costs 6.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Magistral Medium's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-1-70b-vs-magistral-medium
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1-70B scores higher in 1 category and Magistral Medium in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Magistral Medium leads 35.1 to 13.5.
- Llama 3.1-70B is cheaper at $0.40 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $5 for Magistral Medium.
- Magistral Medium accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.1-70B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 35.2 |
| Rank | 308 | 227 |
| Context | 128K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.40 | $2 |
| Output $/M | $0.40 | $5 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3.1-70B: 30.3 (#296)
- Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1260 | 1319 |
| SciCode | — | 39.2% |
| WeirdML | 9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 54.8% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.1-70B: 25.1 (#112)
- Magistral Medium: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 6.9% | — |
| BALROG | 27.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.1-70B: 21.6 (#220)
- Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1241 | 1267 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 16.2% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 6.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| DTBench | 60% | — |
| LMCA | 14.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.92 | — |

## Math

- Llama 3.1-70B: 13.5 (#304)
- Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1252 | 1250 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 3.6% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 21% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 36.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.1-70B: 24.2 (#269)
- Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1209 | 1223 |
| GPQA Diamond | 44.2% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 65.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 42.6% | — |
| MMLU | 80.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.1-70B: 38.8 (#225)
- Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1219 | 1232 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1215 | 1227 |
| LMArena French | 1261 | 1267 |
| LMArena German | 1222 | 1248 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1132 | 1175 |
| LMArena Korean | 1140 | 1125 |
| LMArena Russian | 1234 | 1224 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1253 | 1271 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.1-70B: 65.3 (#223)
- Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1231 | 1254 |
| IFEval | 82.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.1-70B: 37.6 (#214)
- Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1241 | 1295 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.1-70B: 35.4 (#267)
- Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-70B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1261 | 1255 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1232 | 1245 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1256 | 1275 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 784 | — |
| WildBench | 75.8% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.1-70B better than Magistral Medium?

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index. Llama 3.1-70B costs 6.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Magistral Medium's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1-70B or Magistral Medium?

Llama 3.1-70B is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Magistral Medium lists at $2 and $5.

### Is Llama 3.1-70B or Magistral Medium better for coding?

Magistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 30.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Magistral Medium does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-70B and Magistral Medium share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1-70B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Medium has 22.