# Llama 3.1-405B vs QwQ-32B

> QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-3-1-405b-vs-qwq-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 23

## Summary

- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1-405B scores higher in 0 categories and QwQ-32B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where QwQ-32B leads 38.0 to 18.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 9.7% for Llama 3.1-405B and 59.2% for QwQ-32B.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 3.1-405B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.7 | 39.8 |
| Rank | 288 | 159 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 3.1-405B: 33.1 (#262)
- QwQ-32B: 35.4 (#226)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-405B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1291 | 1333 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| WeirdML | 21.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 3.1-405B: 21.0 (#140)
- QwQ-32B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-405B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 7.4% | — |
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 3.1-405B: 16.8 (#300)
- QwQ-32B: 23.7 (#174)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-405B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1269 | 1325 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 128.75 | 137.6 |
| ForecastBench | 59.9 | 58.3 |
| SimpleBench | 23% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 45% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| DTBench | 61.4% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 82.9% | — |
| HellaSwag | 89.2% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |
| PIQA | 85.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 89.2% | — |

## Math

- Llama 3.1-405B: 18.4 (#290)
- QwQ-32B: 38.0 (#143)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-405B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 9.7% | 59.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1281 | 1359 |
| Omni-MATH | 24.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | 49.8% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 3.1-405B: 30.4 (#227)
- QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#158)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-405B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 50.9% | 65.3% |
| Confabulations | 17.6% | 15.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1243 | 1324 |
| MMLU-Pro | 72.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 52.2% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 95.3% | — |
| MMLU | 84.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 82.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 3.1-405B: 40.7 (#214)
- QwQ-32B: 44.8 (#176)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-405B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1248 | 1305 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1242 | 1378 |
| LMArena French | 1279 | 1336 |
| LMArena German | 1252 | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1208 | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | 1184 | 1279 |
| LMArena Russian | 1265 | 1297 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1260 | 1354 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 3.1-405B: 65.9 (#214)
- QwQ-32B: 72.6 (#137)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-405B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1259 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |
| IFEval | 81.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Llama 3.1-405B: 38.4 (#197)
- QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-405B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1266 | 1308 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 3.1-405B: 38.9 (#251)
- QwQ-32B: 50.6 (#180)

| Benchmark | Llama 3.1-405B | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1284 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1262 | 1288 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 870 | 1257 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1297 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| WildBench | 78.3% | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 3.1-405B better than QwQ-32B?

QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 30.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 3.1-405B or QwQ-32B better for coding?

QwQ-32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.4 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-405B and QwQ-32B share?

23 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1-405B has 42 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.