# Llama 2-7B vs Step 3.7 Flash

> Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-7b-vs-step-3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 42.9 to 30.7.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-7B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 317 | 207 |
| Context | — | 256K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| LMArena Coding | 1002 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1009 | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 39.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 99.06 | — |
| HellaSwag | 77.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 73.3% | — |
| PIQA | 78.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 69.2% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233)
- Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1042 | — |
| GSM8K | 16.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 45.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 77.9% | — |
| MMLU | 45.8% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 58.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 2-7B: —
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 973 | — |
| LMArena French | 970 | — |
| LMArena German | 978 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 995 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1007 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1006 | — |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 999 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298)
- Step 3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1053 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1029 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-7B better than Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 2-7B or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-7B and Step 3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-7B has 29 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.