# Llama 2-7B vs Step 3.5 Flash

> Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-7b-vs-step-3-5-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-7B scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3.5 Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Step 3.5 Flash leads 58.8 to 28.0.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-7B | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 42.3 |
| Rank | 317 | 116 |
| Context | — | 256K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 42.4 (#105)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1002 | 1436 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 22.2 (#202)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1009 | 1411 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 28.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 39.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 99.06 | — |
| HellaSwag | 77.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 73.3% | — |
| PIQA | 78.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 69.2% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 42.6 (#84)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1042 | 1408 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 66.8% |
| GSM8K | 16.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 39.6 (#132)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | 1421 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 45.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 77.9% | — |
| MMLU | 45.8% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 58.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 2-7B: —
- Step 3.5 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 50.5 (#119)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | 973 | 1447 |
| LMArena French | 970 | 1421 |
| LMArena German | 978 | 1405 |
| LMArena Russian | 995 | 1385 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1007 | 1419 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1354 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1352 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 73.1 (#124)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1006 | 1385 |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#117)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 999 | 1402 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298)
- Step 3.5 Flash: 58.8 (#113)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1053 | 1403 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | 1357 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1029 | 1405 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-7B better than Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 2-7B or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-7B and Step 3.5 Flash share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-7B has 29 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.