# Llama 2-7B vs Qwen3 Max

> Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-7b-vs-qwen3-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-7B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3 Max leads 62.6 to 28.1.
- Llama 2-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 28.6 | 43.5 |
| Rank | 315 | 82 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 2-7B: 28.7 (#302)
- Qwen3 Max: 42.4 (#93)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1002 | 1456 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 370.45 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 2-7B: —
- Qwen3 Max: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 71.56 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-7B: 15.1 (#309)
- Qwen3 Max: 22.0 (#186)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1009 | 1448 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 98.54 | 142.41 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 30.1% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 82.1% |
| LMCA | — | 28.3% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 39.2% | — |
| HellaSwag | 77.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 73.3% | — |
| PIQA | 78.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 69.2% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#231)
- Qwen3 Max: 37.6 (#94)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1042 | 1447 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.1% |
| GSM8K | 16.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-7B: 27.7 (#243)
- Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#72)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | 1457 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 72.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 48.7% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 45.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 77.9% | — |
| MMLU | 45.8% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 58.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 2-7B: —
- Qwen3 Max: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-7B: 23.9 (#288)
- Qwen3 Max: 53.9 (#58)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 1429 |
| LMArena Chinese | 973 | 1479 |
| LMArena French | 969 | 1450 |
| LMArena German | 978 | 1463 |
| LMArena Russian | 995 | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1007 | 1463 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1397 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-7B: 51.0 (#293)
- Qwen3 Max: 75.0 (#81)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1006 | 1420 |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#282)
- Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#129)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 999 | 1439 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 14.5% |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-7B: 28.1 (#293)
- Qwen3 Max: 62.6 (#72)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1053 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | 1401 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1029 | 1446 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-7B better than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 2-7B or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-7B and Qwen3 Max share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-7B has 29 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.