# Llama 2-7B vs Qwen3 32B

> Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-7b-vs-qwen3-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-7B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 32B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3 32B leads 53.1 to 28.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 0% for Llama 2-7B and 5% for Qwen3 32B.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 28.6 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 315 | 166 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 2-7B: 28.7 (#302)
- Qwen3 32B: 37.3 (#184)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1002 | 1358 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 40% |
| SciCode | — | 35.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 2-7B: —
- Qwen3 32B: 32.3 (#58)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-7B: 15.1 (#309)
- Qwen3 32B: 19.6 (#233)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1009 | 1335 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 98.54 | 138.51 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 54.9% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| DTBench | — | 67.5% |
| LMCA | — | 17.3% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 39.2% | — |
| HellaSwag | 77.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 73.3% | — |
| PIQA | 78.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 69.2% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#231)
- Qwen3 32B: 37.9 (#89)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1042 | 1399 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.9% |
| GSM8K | 16.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-7B: 27.7 (#243)
- Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#112)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | 1362 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.9% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 45.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 77.9% | — |
| MMLU | 45.8% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 58.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 2-7B: —
- Qwen3 32B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-7B: 23.9 (#288)
- Qwen3 32B: 45.8 (#162)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 1317 |
| LMArena Chinese | 973 | 1357 |
| LMArena German | 978 | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | 995 | 1311 |
| LMArena French | 969 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1007 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-7B: 51.0 (#293)
- Qwen3 32B: 69.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1006 | 1305 |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#282)
- Qwen3 32B: 43.7 (#83)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 999 | 1327 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 74.2% |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-7B: 28.1 (#293)
- Qwen3 32B: 53.1 (#158)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1053 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1029 | 1331 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-7B better than Qwen3 32B?

Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 2-7B or Qwen3 32B better for coding?

Qwen3 32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.3 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-7B and Qwen3 32B share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-7B has 29 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.