# Llama 2-7B vs Qwen3 14B

> Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.0 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-7b-vs-qwen3-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-7B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 14B in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 14B leads 39.2 to 27.7.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 28.6 | 35.0 |
| Rank | 315 | 222 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.35 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 2-7B: 28.7 (#302)
- Qwen3 14B: 36.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1002 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 2-7B: —
- Qwen3 14B: 29.4 (#78)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-7B: 15.1 (#309)
- Qwen3 14B: 18.1 (#272)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 98.54 | 138.23 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1009 | — |
| DTBench | — | 64% |
| LMCA | — | 18.2% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 39.2% | — |
| HellaSwag | 77.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 73.3% | — |
| PIQA | 78.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 69.2% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#231)
- Qwen3 14B: 37.0 (#102)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1042 | — |
| GSM8K | 16.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-7B: 27.7 (#243)
- Qwen3 14B: 39.2 (#124)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 63.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 45.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 77.9% | — |
| MMLU | 45.8% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 58.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 2-7B: —
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-7B: 23.9 (#288)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 973 | — |
| LMArena French | 969 | — |
| LMArena German | 978 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 995 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1007 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-7B: 51.0 (#293)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1006 | — |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#282)
- Qwen3 14B: 38.0 (#201)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 999 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-7B: 28.1 (#293)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1053 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1029 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-7B better than Qwen3 14B?

Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.0 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 2-7B or Qwen3 14B better for coding?

Qwen3 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.7 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-7B and Qwen3 14B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-7B has 29 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.