# Llama 2-7B vs Qwen1.5 4b Chat

> Llama 2-7B and Qwen1.5 4b Chat score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.1 vs 28.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-7b-vs-qwen1-5-4b-chat
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-7B scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen1.5 4b Chat in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama 2-7B leads 28.0 to 23.8.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-7B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 28.8 |
| Rank | 317 | 322 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 29.1 (#308)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1002 | 999 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 18.5 (#279)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1009 | 976 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 39.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 99.06 | — |
| HellaSwag | 77.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 73.3% | — |
| PIQA | 78.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 69.2% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.4 (#234)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1042 | 1026 |
| GSM8K | 16.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.7 (#255)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | 980 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 45.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 77.9% | — |
| MMLU | 45.8% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 58.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 2-7B: —
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.1 (#290)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 979 |
| LMArena Chinese | 973 | 1024 |
| LMArena German | 978 | 902 |
| LMArena Russian | 995 | 952 |
| LMArena French | 970 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1007 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.0 (#300)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1006 | 978 |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#290)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 999 | 988 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298)
- Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.8 (#309)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1053 | 997 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | 969 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1029 | 977 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-7B better than Qwen1.5 4b Chat?

Llama 2-7B and Qwen1.5 4b Chat score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.1 vs 28.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Llama 2-7B or Qwen1.5 4b Chat better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (29.2 vs 29.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-7B and Qwen1.5 4b Chat share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-7B has 29 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13.