# Llama 2-7B vs Qwen Plus

> Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-7b-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-7B scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen Plus in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen Plus leads 52.2 to 28.0.
- Llama 2-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-7B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 37.1 |
| Rank | 317 | 210 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307)
- Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1002 | 1328 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312)
- Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1009 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 39.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 99.06 | — |
| HellaSwag | 77.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 73.3% | — |
| PIQA | 78.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 69.2% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233)
- Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1042 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
| GSM8K | 16.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248)
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | 1328 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 45.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 77.9% | — |
| MMLU | 45.8% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 58.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 2-7B: —
- Qwen Plus: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293)
- Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 973 | 1347 |
| LMArena Russian | 995 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 970 | — |
| LMArena German | 978 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1007 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298)
- Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1006 | 1303 |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287)
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 999 | 1324 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298)
- Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1053 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1029 | 1336 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-7B better than Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 2-7B or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-7B and Qwen Plus share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-7B has 29 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.