# Llama 2-7B vs Palm 2

> Llama 2-7B and Palm 2 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (28.6 vs 29.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-7b-vs-palm-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-7B scores higher in 3 categories and Palm 2 in 4 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Palm 2 leads 18.2 to 15.1.
- Llama 2-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-7B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Google |
| Noometry Index | 28.6 | 29.4 |
| Rank | 315 | 296 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 2-7B: 28.7 (#302)
- Palm 2: 28.5 (#306)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1002 | 995 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-7B: 15.1 (#309)
- Palm 2: 18.2 (#270)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1009 | 1005 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 39.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 98.54 | — |
| HellaSwag | 77.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 73.3% | — |
| PIQA | 78.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 69.2% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#231)
- Palm 2: 28.4 (#229)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1042 | 1049 |
| GSM8K | 16.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-7B: 27.7 (#243)
- Palm 2: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 45.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 77.9% | — |
| MMLU | 45.8% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 58.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 2-7B: —
- Palm 2: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-7B: 23.9 (#288)
- Palm 2: 21.1 (#290)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 916 |
| LMArena Chinese | 973 | 887 |
| LMArena French | 969 | — |
| LMArena German | 978 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 995 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1007 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-7B: 51.0 (#293)
- Palm 2: 51.3 (#291)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1006 | 1010 |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#282)
- Palm 2: 30.7 (#280)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 999 | 1010 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-7B: 28.1 (#293)
- Palm 2: 25.7 (#299)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1053 | 1027 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | 991 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1029 | 994 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-7B better than Palm 2?

Llama 2-7B and Palm 2 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (28.6 vs 29.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Llama 2-7B or Palm 2 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (28.7 vs 28.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-7B and Palm 2 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-7B has 29 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.