# Llama 2-7B vs Muse Spark 1.2

> Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.8 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-7b-vs-muse-spark-1-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-7B scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.2 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 72.6 to 28.1.
- Llama 2-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-7B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 28.6 | 49.8 |
| Rank | 315 | 44 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $4.25 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 2-7B: 28.7 (#302)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 48.6 (#49)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1002 | 1497 |
| DeepSWE | — | 54.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1532 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 12% |
| SciCode | — | 56.4% |
| WeirdML | — | 60.3% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 2-7B: —
- Muse Spark 1.2: 29.5 (#77)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 36.4% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 16% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-7B: 15.1 (#309)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 50.4 (#32)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1009 | 1490 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 98.54 | 155.18 |
| SimpleBench | — | 74.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.2% |
| CritPt | — | 17.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | — | 94.7% |
| LMCA | — | 48.4% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 39.2% | — |
| HellaSwag | 77.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 73.3% | — |
| PIQA | 78.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 69.2% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#231)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 43.8 (#68)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 43% |
| LMArena Math | 1042 | — |
| GSM8K | 16.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-7B: 27.7 (#243)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 53.9 (#49)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | 1485 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 60.3% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 45.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 77.9% | — |
| MMLU | 45.8% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 58.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 2-7B: —
- Muse Spark 1.2: 42.6 (#24)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1304 |
| ScienceQA | 43.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-7B: 23.9 (#288)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 57.4 (#10)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 1479 |
| LMArena Chinese | 973 | 1519 |
| LMArena Russian | 995 | 1494 |
| LMArena French | 969 | — |
| LMArena German | 978 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1007 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-7B: 51.0 (#293)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 77.1 (#30)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1006 | 1466 |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#282)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 45.4 (#35)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 999 | 1483 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-7B: 28.1 (#293)
- Muse Spark 1.2: 72.6 (#14)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1053 | 1486 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | 1444 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1029 | 1504 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1840 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-7B better than Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.8 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 2-7B or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-7B and Muse Spark 1.2 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-7B has 29 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 28.