# Llama 2-7B vs Mistral Medium 3.5

> Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-7b-vs-mistral-medium-3-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-7B scores higher in 0 categories and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 58.5 to 28.0.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-7B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 40.2 |
| Rank | 317 | 152 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $7.50 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.0 (#213)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1002 | 1461 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1264 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 17.3 (#295)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1009 | 1436 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 99.06 | 141.35 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 41.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 12.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 39.2% | — |
| HellaSwag | 77.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 73.3% | — |
| PIQA | 78.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 69.2% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.1 (#113)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1042 | 1431 |
| GSM8K | 16.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 40.0 (#126)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | 1432 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 45.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 77.9% | — |
| MMLU | 45.8% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 58.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 2-7B: —
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 38.3 (#65)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1223 |
| ScienceQA | 43.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 51.9 (#100)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 973 | 1442 |
| LMArena French | 970 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 978 | 1451 |
| LMArena Russian | 995 | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1007 | 1409 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1385 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.6 (#90)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1006 | 1415 |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#103)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 999 | 1415 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.5 (#117)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1053 | 1421 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | 1374 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1029 | 1423 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 993 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-7B better than Mistral Medium 3.5?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 2-7B or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?

Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-7B and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-7B has 29 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.