# Llama 2-7B vs MiniMax-M2

> MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-7b-vs-minimax-m2
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-7B scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M2 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2 leads 53.0 to 28.0.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 37.4 |
| Rank | 317 | 204 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307)
- MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1002 | 1370 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 61% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1297 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 2-7B: —
- MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 30% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 160.6 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312)
- MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1009 | 1357 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 57.8% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 14.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 39.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 99.06 | — |
| HellaSwag | 77.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 73.3% | — |
| PIQA | 78.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 69.2% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233)
- MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1042 | 1352 |
| GSM8K | 16.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248)
- MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | 1337 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 45.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 77.9% | — |
| MMLU | 45.8% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 58.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 2-7B: —
- MiniMax-M2: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293)
- MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | 973 | 1366 |
| LMArena French | 970 | 1335 |
| LMArena German | 978 | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | 995 | 1331 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1007 | 1326 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298)
- MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1006 | 1328 |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287)
- MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 999 | 1331 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298)
- MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1053 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | 1286 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1029 | 1361 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-7B better than MiniMax-M2?

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 2-7B or MiniMax-M2 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.3 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-7B and MiniMax-M2 share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-7B has 29 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.