# Llama 2-7B vs MiniMax-M2.5

> MiniMax-M2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-7b-vs-minimax-m2-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-7B scores higher in 1 category and MiniMax-M2.5 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.5 leads 54.1 to 28.1.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 28.6 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 315 | 181 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 2-7B: 28.7 (#302)
- MiniMax-M2.5: 47.9 (#53)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1002 | 1380 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 75.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1386 |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | 68.3% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 618.17 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 2-7B: —
- MiniMax-M2.5: 30.2 (#70)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 42.7% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | -23.16 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-7B: 15.1 (#309)
- MiniMax-M2.5: 17.6 (#281)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1009 | 1372 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 98.54 | 146.68 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 55.2% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 63.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 39.2% | — |
| HellaSwag | 77.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 73.3% | — |
| PIQA | 78.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 69.2% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#231)
- MiniMax-M2.5: 25.8 (#242)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1042 | 1378 |
| ProofBench | — | 4% |
| GSM8K | 16.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-7B: 27.7 (#243)
- MiniMax-M2.5: 38.6 (#132)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | 1378 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.1% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 45.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 77.9% | — |
| MMLU | 45.8% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 58.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 2-7B: —
- MiniMax-M2.5: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-7B: 23.9 (#288)
- MiniMax-M2.5: 47.3 (#147)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 1338 |
| LMArena Chinese | 973 | 1392 |
| LMArena French | 969 | 1363 |
| LMArena German | 978 | 1361 |
| LMArena Russian | 995 | 1359 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1007 | 1354 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1169 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1232 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-7B: 51.0 (#293)
- MiniMax-M2.5: 71.7 (#143)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1006 | 1353 |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#282)
- MiniMax-M2.5: 37.4 (#211)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 999 | 1367 |
| CL-bench | — | 11.4% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-7B: 28.1 (#293)
- MiniMax-M2.5: 54.1 (#149)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax-M2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1053 | 1359 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | 1331 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1029 | 1364 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1361 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-7B better than MiniMax-M2.5?

MiniMax-M2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 2-7B or MiniMax-M2.5 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.9 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-7B and MiniMax-M2.5 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-7B has 29 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.5 has 33.