# Llama 2-7B vs MiniMax M1

> MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-7b-vs-minimax-m1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-7B scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax M1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax M1 leads 53.3 to 28.1.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 28.6 | 39.7 |
| Rank | 315 | 146 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 2-7B: 28.7 (#302)
- MiniMax M1: 39.2 (#149)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1002 | 1359 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-7B: 15.1 (#309)
- MiniMax M1: 25.8 (#125)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1009 | 1340 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 39.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 98.54 | — |
| HellaSwag | 77.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 73.3% | — |
| PIQA | 78.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 69.2% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#231)
- MiniMax M1: 34.8 (#152)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1042 | 1360 |
| GSM8K | 16.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-7B: 27.7 (#243)
- MiniMax M1: 35.7 (#168)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | 1316 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 45.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 77.9% | — |
| MMLU | 45.8% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 58.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 2-7B: —
- MiniMax M1: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-7B: 23.9 (#288)
- MiniMax M1: 46.0 (#157)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 1320 |
| LMArena Chinese | 973 | 1361 |
| LMArena French | 969 | 1369 |
| LMArena German | 978 | 1350 |
| LMArena Russian | 995 | 1330 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1007 | 1354 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1220 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1263 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-7B: 51.0 (#293)
- MiniMax M1: 69.5 (#169)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1006 | 1312 |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#282)
- MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#136)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 999 | 1326 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 69.4% |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-7B: 28.1 (#293)
- MiniMax M1: 53.3 (#155)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1053 | 1343 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | 1298 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1029 | 1335 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-7B better than MiniMax M1?

MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 2-7B or MiniMax M1 better for coding?

MiniMax M1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.2 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-7B and MiniMax M1 share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-7B has 29 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.