# Llama 2-7B vs MiMo-V2-Pro

> MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-7b-vs-mimo-v2-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-7B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.8 to 28.0.
- Llama 2-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 43.0 |
| Rank | 317 | 103 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1002 | 1476 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1009 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 39.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 99.06 | — |
| HellaSwag | 77.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 73.3% | — |
| PIQA | 78.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 69.2% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1042 | 1447 |
| GSM8K | 16.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | 1478 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 45.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 77.9% | — |
| MMLU | 45.8% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 58.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 2-7B: —
- MiMo-V2-Pro: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 973 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | 970 | 1469 |
| LMArena German | 978 | 1417 |
| LMArena Russian | 995 | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1007 | 1457 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1400 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1006 | 1445 |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 999 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1053 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1029 | 1456 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-7B better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 2-7B or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-7B and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-7B has 29 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.