# Llama 2-7B vs MiMo-V2-Omni

> MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-7b-vs-mimo-v2-omni
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-7B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 61.6 to 28.1.
- Llama 2-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 28.6 | 42.9 |
| Rank | 315 | 91 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 2-7B: 28.7 (#302)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1002 | 1467 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-7B: 15.1 (#309)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1009 | 1445 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 39.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 98.54 | — |
| HellaSwag | 77.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 73.3% | — |
| PIQA | 78.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 69.2% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#231)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1042 | 1432 |
| GSM8K | 16.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-7B: 27.7 (#243)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | 1449 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 45.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 77.9% | — |
| MMLU | 45.8% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 58.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 2-7B: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |
| ScienceQA | 43.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-7B: 23.9 (#288)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 973 | 1469 |
| LMArena French | 969 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 978 | 1398 |
| LMArena Russian | 995 | 1412 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1007 | 1432 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1318 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1355 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-7B: 51.0 (#293)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1006 | 1428 |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#282)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 999 | 1442 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-7B: 28.1 (#293)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1053 | 1424 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1029 | 1446 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-7B better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 2-7B or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-7B and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-7B has 29 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.