# Llama 2-7B vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

> MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-7b-vs-mimo-v2-5-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-7B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.5 to 28.1.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 28.6 | 44.8 |
| Rank | 315 | 70 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 2-7B: 28.7 (#302)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.0 (#58)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1002 | 1502 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1477 |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-7B: 15.1 (#309)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 25.9 (#124)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1009 | 1487 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| CritPt | — | 4% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | — | 84.5% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 39.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 98.54 | — |
| HellaSwag | 77.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 73.3% | — |
| PIQA | 78.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 69.2% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#231)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 38.6 (#84)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1042 | 1480 |
| ProofBench | — | 22% |
| GSM8K | 16.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-7B: 27.7 (#243)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 41.5 (#100)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | 1501 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 45.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 77.9% | — |
| MMLU | 45.8% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 58.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 2-7B: —
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-7B: 23.9 (#288)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.3 (#33)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | 973 | 1507 |
| LMArena French | 969 | 1489 |
| LMArena German | 978 | 1455 |
| LMArena Russian | 995 | 1450 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1007 | 1470 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1418 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1436 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-7B: 51.0 (#293)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.6 (#21)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1006 | 1477 |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#282)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#38)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 999 | 1482 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-7B: 28.1 (#293)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.5 (#47)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1053 | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | 1440 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1029 | 1477 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1493 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-7B better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 2-7B or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.0 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-7B and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-7B has 29 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.