# Llama 2-7B vs Magistral Small

> Magistral Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-7b-vs-magistral-small
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-7B scores higher in 2 categories and Magistral Small in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Magistral Small leads 38.4 to 29.2.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-7B | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 30.2 |
| Rank | 317 | 296 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.50 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307)
- Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 35.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1002 | — |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312)
- Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 99.06 | 133.19 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 6.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1009 | — |
| DTBench | — | 61.3% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 39.2% | — |
| HellaSwag | 77.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 73.3% | — |
| PIQA | 78.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 69.2% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233)
- Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30% |
| LMArena Math | 1042 | — |
| GSM8K | 16.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248)
- Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1036 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 45.9% | — |
| BoolQ | 77.9% | — |
| MMLU | 45.8% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 58.6% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.7% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 2-7B: —
- Magistral Small: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 43.1% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293)
- Magistral Small: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 973 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 973 | — |
| LMArena French | 970 | — |
| LMArena German | 978 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 995 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1007 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298)
- Magistral Small: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1006 | — |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287)
- Magistral Small: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 999 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298)
- Magistral Small: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-7B | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1053 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1033 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1029 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-7B better than Magistral Small?

Magistral Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 2-7B or Magistral Small better for coding?

Magistral Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-7B and Magistral Small share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-7B has 29 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Small has 10.