# Llama 2-70B vs Wizardlm 70b

> Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-70b-vs-wizardlm-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-70B scores higher in 0 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Wizardlm 70b leads 32.2 to 8.1.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-70B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 24.4 | 33.0 |
| Rank | 349 | 249 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 2-70B: 31.4 (#286)
- Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1079 | 1081 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-70B: 14.4 (#325)
- Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1073 | 1079 |
| DTBench | 41.6% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 64.9% | — |
| CommonsenseQA 2.0 | 50% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 113.79 | — |
| ForecastBench | 51.4 | — |
| HellaSwag | 85.3% | — |
| LAMBADA | 78.9% | — |
| PIQA | 82.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 80.2% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-70B: 8.1 (#326)
- Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1091 | 1116 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 3.3% | — |
| GSM8K | 69.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#310)
- Wizardlm 70b: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 26.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 88.6% | — |
| MMLU | 69.9% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 60.2% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.6% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-70B: 27.7 (#274)
- Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1045 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 995 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 1041 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1083 | 1155 |
| LMArena French | 1090 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 927 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 964 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1143 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-70B: 54.9 (#278)
- Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1071 | 1093 |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#270)
- Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1062 | 1097 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#279)
- Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1115 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1075 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1088 | 1108 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-70B better than Wizardlm 70b?

Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 2-70B or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (31.4 vs 31.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-70B and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-70B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.