# Llama 2-70B vs Qwen3 32B

> Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 24.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-70b-vs-qwen3-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-70B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 32B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 32B leads 40.0 to 7.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 0% for Llama 2-70B and 66.9% for Qwen3 32B.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-70B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 24.1 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 343 | 166 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 2-70B: 30.8 (#281)
- Qwen3 32B: 37.3 (#184)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1079 | 1358 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 40% |
| SciCode | — | 35.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 2-70B: —
- Qwen3 32B: 32.3 (#58)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-70B: 13.7 (#324)
- Qwen3 32B: 19.6 (#233)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1073 | 1335 |
| DTBench | 41.6% | 67.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 113.59 | 138.51 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 54.9% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LMCA | — | 17.3% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 64.9% | — |
| CommonsenseQA 2.0 | 50% | — |
| ForecastBench | 51.4 | — |
| HellaSwag | 85.3% | — |
| LAMBADA | 78.9% | — |
| PIQA | 82.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 80.2% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-70B: 7.5 (#320)
- Qwen3 32B: 37.9 (#89)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0% | 66.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1091 | 1399 |
| MATH Level 5 | 3.3% | — |
| GSM8K | 69.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#305)
- Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#112)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 26.3% | 65.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | 1362 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.9% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 88.6% | — |
| MMLU | 69.9% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 60.2% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.6% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-70B: 27.9 (#269)
- Qwen3 32B: 45.8 (#162)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1045 | 1317 |
| LMArena Chinese | 994 | 1357 |
| LMArena German | 1041 | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | 1083 | 1311 |
| LMArena French | 1089 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 927 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 964 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1142 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-70B: 55.1 (#273)
- Qwen3 32B: 69.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1071 | 1305 |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-70B: 32.2 (#265)
- Qwen3 32B: 43.7 (#83)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1062 | 1327 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 74.2% |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-70B: 32.5 (#274)
- Qwen3 32B: 53.1 (#158)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1115 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1075 | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1088 | 1331 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-70B better than Qwen3 32B?

Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 24.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 2-70B or Qwen3 32B better for coding?

Qwen3 32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.3 versus 30.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-70B and Qwen3 32B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-70B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.