# Llama 2-70B vs Qwen2-72B

> Qwen2-72B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.5 to 24.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-70b-vs-qwen2-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 21

## Summary

- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-70B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2-72B in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2-72B leads 27.9 to 7.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 3.3% for Llama 2-70B and 39.1% for Qwen2-72B.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-70B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 24.1 | 29.5 |
| Rank | 343 | 294 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 2-70B: 30.8 (#281)
- Qwen2-72B: 28.7 (#303)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1079 | 1196 |
| WeirdML | — | 11.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.5% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 2-70B: —
- Qwen2-72B: 16.9 (#138)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-70B: 13.7 (#324)
- Qwen2-72B: 22.2 (#184)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1073 | 1191 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 113.59 | 125.27 |
| DTBench | 41.6% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 64.9% | — |
| CommonsenseQA 2.0 | 50% | — |
| ForecastBench | 51.4 | — |
| HellaSwag | 85.3% | — |
| LAMBADA | 78.9% | — |
| PIQA | 82.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 80.2% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-70B: 7.5 (#320)
- Qwen2-72B: 27.9 (#232)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1091 | 1235 |
| MATH Level 5 | 3.3% | 39.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0% | — |
| GSM8K | 69.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#305)
- Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#270)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 26.3% | 40.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | 1171 |
| MMLU | 69.9% | 82.4% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 88.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 60.2% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.6% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-70B: 27.9 (#269)
- Qwen2-72B: 36.0 (#239)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1045 | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | 994 | 1240 |
| LMArena French | 1089 | 1169 |
| LMArena German | 1041 | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | 927 | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | 964 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1083 | 1169 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1142 | 1168 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-70B: 55.1 (#273)
- Qwen2-72B: 62.0 (#236)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1071 | 1181 |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-70B: 32.2 (#265)
- Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#230)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1062 | 1193 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-70B: 32.5 (#274)
- Qwen2-72B: 41.0 (#236)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1115 | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1075 | 1181 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1088 | 1195 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-70B better than Qwen2-72B?

Qwen2-72B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.5 to 24.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 2-70B or Qwen2-72B better for coding?

Llama 2-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.8 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-70B and Qwen2-72B share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-70B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.