# Llama 2-70B vs Nova 2 Lite

> Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-70b-vs-nova-2-lite
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-70B scores higher in 0 categories and Nova 2 Lite in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Nova 2 Lite leads 43.0 to 7.4.
- Llama 2-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-70B | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 24.4 | 39.7 |
| Rank | 349 | 161 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.50 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 2-70B: 31.4 (#286)
- Nova 2 Lite: 40.7 (#134)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1079 | 1385 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 2-70B: —
- Nova 2 Lite: 24.1 (#121)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.1% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-70B: 14.4 (#325)
- Nova 2 Lite: 27.5 (#118)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1073 | 1364 |
| DTBench | 41.6% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 64.9% | — |
| CommonsenseQA 2.0 | 50% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 113.79 | — |
| ForecastBench | 51.4 | — |
| HellaSwag | 85.3% | — |
| LAMBADA | 78.9% | — |
| PIQA | 82.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 80.2% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-70B: 8.1 (#326)
- Nova 2 Lite: 37.5 (#156)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1091 | 1359 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 3.3% | — |
| GSM8K | 69.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#310)
- Nova 2 Lite: 43.0 (#94)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | 1358 |
| GPQA Diamond | 26.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.1% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 88.6% | — |
| MMLU | 69.9% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 60.2% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.6% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-70B: 27.7 (#274)
- Nova 2 Lite: 47.1 (#153)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1045 | 1337 |
| LMArena Chinese | 995 | 1364 |
| LMArena French | 1090 | 1381 |
| LMArena German | 1041 | 1343 |
| LMArena Japanese | 927 | 1271 |
| LMArena Korean | 964 | 1284 |
| LMArena Russian | 1083 | 1343 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1143 | 1373 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-70B: 54.9 (#278)
- Nova 2 Lite: 70.5 (#161)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1071 | 1335 |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#270)
- Nova 2 Lite: 40.6 (#150)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1062 | 1335 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#279)
- Nova 2 Lite: 53.9 (#154)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1115 | 1362 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1075 | 1291 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1088 | 1338 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-70B better than Nova 2 Lite?

Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 2-70B or Nova 2 Lite better for coding?

Nova 2 Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.7 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-70B and Nova 2 Lite share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-70B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2 Lite has 19.