# Llama 2-70B vs Mistral Nemo

> Mistral Nemo is the stronger model overall, scoring 26.4 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-70b-vs-mistral-nemo
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 7

## Summary

- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-70B scores higher in 1 category and Mistral Nemo in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Mistral Nemo leads 25.5 to 8.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 3.3% for Llama 2-70B and 10.8% for Mistral Nemo.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-70B | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 24.4 | 26.4 |
| Rank | 349 | 337 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.15 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.15 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 2-70B: 31.4 (#286)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1079 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 2-70B: —
- Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-70B: 14.4 (#325)
- Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 41.6% | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 113.79 | 118.68 |
| PIQA | 82.8% | 83.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1073 | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 64.9% | — |
| CommonsenseQA 2.0 | 50% | — |
| ForecastBench | 51.4 | — |
| HellaSwag | 85.3% | — |
| LAMBADA | 78.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 80.2% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-70B: 8.1 (#326)
- Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 3.3% | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | 69.6% | 84.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1091 | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#310)
- Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 26.3% | 29.9% |
| BoolQ | 88.6% | 82.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| MMLU | 69.9% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 60.2% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.6% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-70B: 27.7 (#274)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1045 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 995 | — |
| LMArena French | 1090 | — |
| LMArena German | 1041 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 927 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 964 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1143 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-70B: 54.9 (#278)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1071 | — |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#270)
- Mistral Nemo: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1062 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#279)
- Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1115 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1075 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1088 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-70B better than Mistral Nemo?

Mistral Nemo is the stronger model overall, scoring 26.4 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-70B and Mistral Nemo share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-70B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.