# Llama 2-70B vs Ministral 8B

> Ministral 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.8 to 24.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-70b-vs-ministral-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-70B scores higher in 0 categories and Ministral 8B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Ministral 8B leads 23.7 to 7.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 3.3% for Llama 2-70B and 14.9% for Ministral 8B.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-70B | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 24.1 | 27.8 |
| Rank | 343 | 321 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 2-70B: 30.8 (#281)
- Ministral 8B: 34.4 (#226)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1079 | 1202 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 2-70B: —
- Ministral 8B: 16.2 (#140)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 11.1% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-70B: 13.7 (#324)
- Ministral 8B: 17.7 (#279)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1073 | 1191 |
| DTBench | 41.6% | 45.7% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 64.9% | — |
| CommonsenseQA 2.0 | 50% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 113.59 | — |
| ForecastBench | 51.4 | — |
| HellaSwag | 85.3% | — |
| LAMBADA | 78.9% | — |
| PIQA | 82.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 80.2% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-70B: 7.5 (#320)
- Ministral 8B: 23.7 (#262)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1091 | 1188 |
| MATH Level 5 | 3.3% | 14.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0% | — |
| GSM8K | 69.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#305)
- Ministral 8B: 12.5 (#292)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 26.3% | 27.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | 1170 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.4% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 88.6% | — |
| MMLU | 69.9% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 60.2% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.6% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-70B: 27.9 (#269)
- Ministral 8B: 35.3 (#242)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1045 | 1165 |
| LMArena Chinese | 994 | 1193 |
| LMArena Russian | 1083 | 1195 |
| LMArena French | 1089 | — |
| LMArena German | 1041 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 927 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 964 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1142 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-70B: 55.1 (#273)
- Ministral 8B: 60.7 (#245)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1071 | 1161 |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-70B: 32.2 (#265)
- Ministral 8B: 36.7 (#222)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1062 | 1212 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-70B: 32.5 (#274)
- Ministral 8B: 39.8 (#241)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | Ministral 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1115 | 1191 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1075 | 1175 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1088 | 1166 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-70B better than Ministral 8B?

Ministral 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.8 to 24.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 2-70B or Ministral 8B better for coding?

Ministral 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.4 versus 30.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-70B and Ministral 8B share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-70B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 8B has 17.