# Llama 2-70B vs MiMo-V2-Omni

> MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 24.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-70b-vs-mimo-v2-omni
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-70B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 39.9 to 7.4.
- Llama 2-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-70B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 24.1 | 42.9 |
| Rank | 343 | 91 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 2-70B: 30.8 (#281)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1079 | 1467 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-70B: 13.7 (#324)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1073 | 1445 |
| DTBench | 41.6% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 64.9% | — |
| CommonsenseQA 2.0 | 50% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 113.59 | — |
| ForecastBench | 51.4 | — |
| HellaSwag | 85.3% | — |
| LAMBADA | 78.9% | — |
| PIQA | 82.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 80.2% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-70B: 7.5 (#320)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1091 | 1432 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 3.3% | — |
| GSM8K | 69.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#305)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | 1449 |
| GPQA Diamond | 26.3% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 78.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 88.6% | — |
| MMLU | 69.9% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 60.2% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.6% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 2-70B: —
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-70B: 27.9 (#269)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1045 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 994 | 1469 |
| LMArena French | 1089 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 1041 | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | 927 | 1318 |
| LMArena Korean | 964 | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | 1083 | 1412 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1142 | 1432 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-70B: 55.1 (#273)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1071 | 1428 |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-70B: 32.2 (#265)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1062 | 1442 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-70B: 32.5 (#274)
- MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-70B | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1115 | 1424 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1075 | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1088 | 1446 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-70B better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 24.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 2-70B or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 30.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-70B and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-70B has 35 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.