# Llama 2-34B vs phi-3-medium 14B

> phi-3-medium 14B has enough public results to be ranked (#306); Llama 2-34B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-34b-vs-phi-3-medium-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 7

## Summary

- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both.
- phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-34B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | — | 29.7 |
| Rank | — | 306 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 2-34B: —
- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-34B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-34B: —
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-34B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BIG-Bench Hard | 44.1% | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 105.2 | 121.23 |
| WinoGrande | 76.7% | 81.5% |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| PIQA | 81.9% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-34B: —
- phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-34B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
| GSM8K | 42.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-34B: —
- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-34B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 54.5% | 91.6% |
| MMLU | 62.6% | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | 58.2% | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | 84.6% | 73.9% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| BoolQ | 83.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-34B better than phi-3-medium 14B?

phi-3-medium 14B has enough public results to be ranked (#306); Llama 2-34B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-34B and phi-3-medium 14B share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-34B has 10 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.