# Llama 2-34B vs Mercury 2.5

> Neither Llama 2-34B nor Mercury 2.5 has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-34b-vs-mercury-2-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-34B | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Inception |
| Noometry Index | — | 30.2 |
| Rank | — | — |
| Context | — | 260K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.04 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 2-34B: —
- Mercury 2.5: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-34B | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ALE-Bench | — | 301.65 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-34B: —
- Mercury 2.5: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-34B | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| BIG-Bench Hard | 44.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 104.81 | — |
| PIQA | 81.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 76.7% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-34B: —
- Mercury 2.5: 22.4

| Benchmark | Llama 2-34B | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
| GSM8K | 42.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-34B: —
- Mercury 2.5: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-34B | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 54.5% | — |
| BoolQ | 83.7% | — |
| MMLU | 62.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 58.2% | — |
| TriviaQA | 84.6% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-34B better than Mercury 2.5?

Neither Llama 2-34B nor Mercury 2.5 has enough public benchmark results to be ranked yet; the rows below show what has been published.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-34B and Mercury 2.5 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-34B has 10 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2.5 has 2.