# Llama 2-13B vs Wizardlm 13b

> Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-13b-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-13B scores higher in 3 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 4 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Wizardlm 13b leads 19.4 to 12.8.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-13B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 309 | 274 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1062 | 1035 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337)
- Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1051 | 1018 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 42.2% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 58.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 106.17 | — |
| HellaSwag | 80.7% | — |
| LAMBADA | 76.5% | — |
| PIQA | 80.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 72.8% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1065 | 1017 |
| GSM8K | 36.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1030 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 60.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 82.4% | — |
| MMLU | 55.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 57% | — |
| TriviaQA | 79.6% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 2-13B: —
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 55.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1024 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1001 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1044 | — |
| LMArena German | 1009 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 894 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 953 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1087 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1045 | 1048 |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1064 | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1084 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1047 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1050 | 1047 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-13B better than Wizardlm 13b?

Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 2-13B or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (30.9 vs 30.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-13B and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-13B has 32 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.