# Llama 2-13B vs Qwen1.5-32B

> Llama 2-13B and Qwen1.5-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.6 vs 30.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-13b-vs-qwen1-5-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-13B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen1.5-32B in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Llama 2-13B leads 28.1 to 13.5.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-13B | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 30.5 |
| Rank | 309 | 293 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1062 | 1155 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.3% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 42% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1051 | 1130 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 42.2% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 58.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 106.17 | — |
| HellaSwag | 80.7% | — |
| LAMBADA | 76.5% | — |
| PIQA | 80.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 72.8% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1065 | 1155 |
| GSM8K | 36.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1030 | 1126 |
| MMLU | 55.6% | 74.4% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 30.7% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 60.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 82.4% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 57% | — |
| TriviaQA | 79.6% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 2-13B: —
- Qwen1.5-32B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 55.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1024 | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1001 | 1177 |
| LMArena French | 1044 | 1101 |
| LMArena German | 1009 | 1058 |
| LMArena Japanese | 894 | 1027 |
| LMArena Korean | 953 | 1008 |
| LMArena Russian | 1055 | 1073 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1087 | 1089 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1045 | 1116 |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1064 | 1146 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1084 | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1047 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1050 | 1140 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-13B better than Qwen1.5-32B?

Llama 2-13B and Qwen1.5-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.6 vs 30.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Llama 2-13B or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (30.9 vs 31.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-13B and Qwen1.5-32B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-13B has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.