# Llama 2-13B vs Palm 2

> Llama 2-13B and Palm 2 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.6 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-13b-vs-palm-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-13B scores higher in 6 categories and Palm 2 in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Palm 2 leads 19.1 to 12.8.
- Llama 2-13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-13B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Google |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 30.0 |
| Rank | 309 | 298 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291)
- Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1062 | 994 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337)
- Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1051 | 1005 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 42.2% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 58.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 106.17 | — |
| HellaSwag | 80.7% | — |
| LAMBADA | 76.5% | — |
| PIQA | 80.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 72.8% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229)
- Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1065 | 1049 |
| GSM8K | 36.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249)
- Palm 2: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1030 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 60.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 82.4% | — |
| MMLU | 55.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 57% | — |
| TriviaQA | 79.6% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 2-13B: —
- Palm 2: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 55.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279)
- Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1024 | 916 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1001 | 887 |
| LMArena French | 1044 | — |
| LMArena German | 1009 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 894 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 953 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1087 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287)
- Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1045 | 1010 |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269)
- Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1064 | 1010 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289)
- Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1084 | 1027 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1047 | 991 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1050 | 994 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-13B better than Palm 2?

Llama 2-13B and Palm 2 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.6 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Llama 2-13B or Palm 2 better for coding?

Llama 2-13B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.9 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-13B and Palm 2 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-13B has 32 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.