# Llama 2-13B vs MiniMax-M2.1

> MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-13b-vs-minimax-m2-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-13B scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M2.1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.1 leads 58.3 to 29.8.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-13B | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 38.9 |
| Rank | 309 | 178 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 40.4 (#143)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1062 | 1421 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1384 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 623.83 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 2-13B: —
- MiniMax-M2.1: 27.9 (#98)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 36.6% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 16.6 (#302)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1051 | 1411 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 11.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 42.2% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 58.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 106.17 | — |
| HellaSwag | 80.7% | — |
| LAMBADA | 76.5% | — |
| PIQA | 80.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 72.8% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#138)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1065 | 1397 |
| GSM8K | 36.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#147)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1030 | 1431 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 11.8% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 60.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 82.4% | — |
| MMLU | 55.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 57% | — |
| TriviaQA | 79.6% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 2-13B: —
- MiniMax-M2.1: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 55.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 50.0 (#128)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1024 | 1378 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1001 | 1430 |
| LMArena French | 1044 | 1404 |
| LMArena German | 1009 | 1381 |
| LMArena Japanese | 894 | 1287 |
| LMArena Korean | 953 | 1298 |
| LMArena Russian | 1055 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1087 | 1397 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 73.8 (#112)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1045 | 1400 |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 43.2 (#101)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1064 | 1416 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 58.3 (#120)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1084 | 1392 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1047 | 1361 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1050 | 1396 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-13B better than MiniMax-M2.1?

MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 2-13B or MiniMax-M2.1 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-13B and MiniMax-M2.1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-13B has 32 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.1 has 22.