# Llama 2-13B vs MiniMax M1

> MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-13b-vs-minimax-m1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-13B scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax M1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax M1 leads 53.3 to 30.0.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-13B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 39.7 |
| Rank | 304 | 146 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 2-13B: 30.4 (#287)
- MiniMax M1: 39.2 (#149)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1062 | 1359 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-13B: 12.3 (#333)
- MiniMax M1: 25.8 (#125)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1051 | 1340 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 42.2% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 58.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 105.8 | — |
| HellaSwag | 80.7% | — |
| LAMBADA | 76.5% | — |
| PIQA | 80.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 72.8% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-13B: 28.7 (#226)
- MiniMax M1: 34.8 (#152)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1065 | 1360 |
| GSM8K | 36.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-13B: 27.5 (#244)
- MiniMax M1: 35.7 (#168)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1030 | 1316 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 60.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 82.4% | — |
| MMLU | 55.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 57% | — |
| TriviaQA | 79.6% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 2-13B: —
- MiniMax M1: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 55.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-13B: 26.7 (#274)
- MiniMax M1: 46.0 (#157)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1024 | 1320 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1001 | 1361 |
| LMArena French | 1043 | 1369 |
| LMArena German | 1009 | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | 894 | 1220 |
| LMArena Korean | 953 | 1263 |
| LMArena Russian | 1055 | 1330 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1086 | 1354 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-13B: 53.5 (#282)
- MiniMax M1: 69.5 (#169)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1046 | 1312 |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#264)
- MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#136)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1064 | 1326 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 69.4% |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-13B: 30.0 (#284)
- MiniMax M1: 53.3 (#155)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1085 | 1343 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1047 | 1298 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1050 | 1335 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-13B better than MiniMax M1?

MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 2-13B or MiniMax M1 better for coding?

MiniMax M1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.2 versus 30.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-13B and MiniMax M1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-13B has 32 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.