# Llama 2-13B vs Magistral Medium

> Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-13b-vs-magistral-medium
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-13B scores higher in 1 category and Magistral Medium in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Magistral Medium leads 46.3 to 29.8.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-13B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 35.2 |
| Rank | 309 | 227 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $5 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291)
- Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1062 | 1319 |
| SciCode | — | 39.2% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337)
- Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1051 | 1267 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 16.2% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 6.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 42.2% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 58.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 106.17 | — |
| HellaSwag | 80.7% | — |
| LAMBADA | 76.5% | — |
| PIQA | 80.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 72.8% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229)
- Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1065 | 1250 |
| GSM8K | 36.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249)
- Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1030 | 1223 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 60.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 82.4% | — |
| MMLU | 55.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 57% | — |
| TriviaQA | 79.6% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 2-13B: —
- Magistral Medium: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 55.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279)
- Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1024 | 1232 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1001 | 1227 |
| LMArena French | 1044 | 1267 |
| LMArena German | 1009 | 1248 |
| LMArena Japanese | 894 | 1175 |
| LMArena Korean | 953 | 1125 |
| LMArena Russian | 1055 | 1224 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1087 | 1271 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287)
- Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1045 | 1254 |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269)
- Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1064 | 1295 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289)
- Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1084 | 1255 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1047 | 1245 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1050 | 1275 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-13B better than Magistral Medium?

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 2-13B or Magistral Medium better for coding?

Magistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-13B and Magistral Medium share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-13B has 32 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Medium has 22.