# Llama 2-13B vs Llama 3.2 1B

> Llama 2-13B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.1 to 19.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-13b-vs-llama-3-2-1b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-13B scores higher in 7 categories and Llama 3.2 1B in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Llama 2-13B leads 27.5 to 7.2.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-13B | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 19.9 |
| Rank | 304 | 349 |
| Context | — | 60K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.027 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 2-13B: 30.4 (#287)
- Llama 3.2 1B: 20.6 (#333)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1062 | 1071 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 8.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 11.3% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Llama 2-13B: —
- Llama 3.2 1B: 14.5 (#142)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 10.8% |
| BALROG | — | 6.6% |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-13B: 12.3 (#333)
- Llama 3.2 1B: 15.6 (#304)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1051 | 1044 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 105.8 | 101.95 |
| DTBench | 42.2% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 58.2% | — |
| HellaSwag | 80.7% | — |
| LAMBADA | 76.5% | — |
| PIQA | 80.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 72.8% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-13B: 28.7 (#226)
- Llama 3.2 1B: 9.7 (#308)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1065 | 1086 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 0.6% |
| GSM8K | 36.9% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-13B: 27.5 (#244)
- Llama 3.2 1B: 7.2 (#307)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1030 | 1007 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 23.9% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 60.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 82.4% | — |
| MMLU | 55.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 57% | — |
| TriviaQA | 79.6% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 2-13B: —
- Llama 3.2 1B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 55.8% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-13B: 26.7 (#274)
- Llama 3.2 1B: 23.9 (#287)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1024 | 973 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1001 | 958 |
| LMArena German | 1009 | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | 1055 | 941 |
| LMArena French | 1043 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 894 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 953 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1086 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-13B: 53.5 (#282)
- Llama 3.2 1B: 52.6 (#285)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1046 | 1031 |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#264)
- Llama 3.2 1B: 31.9 (#269)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1064 | 1050 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-13B: 30.0 (#284)
- Llama 3.2 1B: 21.4 (#305)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Llama 3.2 1B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1085 | 1055 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1047 | 1033 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1050 | 1030 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 200 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-13B better than Llama 3.2 1B?

Llama 2-13B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.1 to 19.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 2-13B or Llama 3.2 1B better for coding?

Llama 2-13B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.4 versus 20.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-13B and Llama 3.2 1B share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-13B has 32 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 1B has 22.