# Llama 2-13B vs Llama 2-7B

> Llama 2-13B and Llama 2-7B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.1 vs 28.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-2-13b-vs-llama-2-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 29

## Summary

- They share 29 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-13B scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 2-7B in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 2-13B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 28.6 |
| Rank | 304 | 315 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 2-13B: 30.4 (#287)
- Llama 2-7B: 28.7 (#302)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1062 | 1002 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 2-13B: 12.3 (#333)
- Llama 2-7B: 15.1 (#309)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1051 | 1009 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 58.2% | 39.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 105.8 | 98.54 |
| HellaSwag | 80.7% | 77.2% |
| LAMBADA | 76.5% | 73.3% |
| PIQA | 80.8% | 78.8% |
| WinoGrande | 72.8% | 69.2% |
| DTBench | 42.2% | — |

## Math

- Llama 2-13B: 28.7 (#226)
- Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#231)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1065 | 1042 |
| GSM8K | 36.9% | 16.7% |

## Knowledge

- Llama 2-13B: 27.5 (#244)
- Llama 2-7B: 27.7 (#243)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1030 | 1036 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 60.3% | 45.9% |
| BoolQ | 82.4% | 77.9% |
| MMLU | 55.6% | 45.8% |
| OpenBookQA | 57% | 58.6% |
| TriviaQA | 79.6% | 73.7% |

## Multimodal

- Llama 2-13B: —
- Llama 2-7B: —

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 55.8% | 43.1% |

## Multilingual

- Llama 2-13B: 26.7 (#274)
- Llama 2-7B: 23.9 (#288)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1024 | 973 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1001 | 973 |
| LMArena French | 1043 | 969 |
| LMArena German | 1009 | 978 |
| LMArena Russian | 1055 | 995 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1086 | 1007 |
| LMArena Japanese | 894 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 953 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 2-13B: 53.5 (#282)
- Llama 2-7B: 51.0 (#293)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1046 | 1006 |

## Long Context

- Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#264)
- Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#282)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1064 | 999 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 2-13B: 30.0 (#284)
- Llama 2-7B: 28.1 (#293)

| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1085 | 1053 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1047 | 1033 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1050 | 1029 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 2-13B better than Llama 2-7B?

Llama 2-13B and Llama 2-7B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.1 vs 28.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Llama 2-13B or Llama 2-7B better for coding?

Llama 2-13B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.4 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 2-13B and Llama 2-7B share?

29 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-13B has 32 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-7B has 29.