# Llama 13b vs Step 3

> Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/llama-13b-vs-step-3
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Step 3 leads 54.3 to 13.8.

## Snapshot

| | Llama 13b | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 24.4 | 40.5 |
| Rank | 348 | 149 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)
- Step 3: 40.1 (#147)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 683 | 1367 |

## Reasoning

- Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)
- Step 3: 28.4 (#105)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 728 | 1355 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 62.3% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 37.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 100.58 | — |
| HellaSwag | 79.2% | — |
| LAMBADA | 75.2% | — |
| PIQA | 80.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | 73% | — |

## Math

- Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)
- Step 3: 37.6 (#148)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 838 | 1366 |
| GSM8K | 20.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Llama 13b: —
- Step 3: 36.8 (#164)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1333 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 52.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 78.7% | — |
| MMLU | 47.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 56.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 77.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Llama 13b: —
- Step 3: 35.5 (#86)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1177 |
| ScienceQA | 43.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)
- Step 3: 46.3 (#159)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 819 | 1327 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1397 |
| LMArena German | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1371 |

## Instruction Following

- Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)
- Step 3: 70.4 (#164)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 781 | 1332 |

## Long Context

- Llama 13b: —
- Step 3: 40.3 (#157)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1326 |

## Writing & Preference

- Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)
- Step 3: 54.3 (#151)

| Benchmark | Llama 13b | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 834 | 1350 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 794 | 1321 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 753 | 1341 |

## FAQ

### Is Llama 13b better than Step 3?

Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Llama 13b or Step 3 better for coding?

Step 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Step 3 share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.